Meditation as Willpower Training

I recently read the book Deep Work by Cal Newport and was thinking about why some people don’t have the capacity to focus for hours at a time despite years of schooling. According to books like The Willpower Instinct by Kelly McGonigal, willpower should act like a muscle and so theoretically their willpower should have improved greatly. Yet, I notice people don’t necessarily improve their ability to focus too much after high school and it stays rather constant. Some people even get worse once they start living alone. I think that this is because no one approaches tasks such as this one with the purpose of improving the length of the focus. Their goal is usually just to accumulate knowledge, solve problems and get work done. I suggest using meditation to increase this length of time that can be spent working on any given task. Using meditation instead of a studying session is to clearly separate time spent training focus and time spent getting work done and not try to make studying a chore of both achieving the studying goal and training focusing ability.

There are many forms of meditation. For the purposes of this idea I am not really considering the type of meditation so long as there is a focusing aspect to it, which most meditation practices have. The goal is to progressively lengthen the period of time that you can stay focused. Most people spend about 10 to 30 minutes a day mediating if they do practice it. Some will even do around an hour a day. Rather such a small amount of time a day, I am going to only meditate every two days but will increase this time by about 20 minutes each time. Obviously if I can’t handle the new time I’ll increment the time by a smaller amount or repeat the previous amount of time. It is not feasible to meditate for 4 hours every day but once every few days is. To me, the sacrifice of not being able to meditate every single day because these sessions are too long is worth the benefit of practicing the ability to focus for progressively longer periods of time at a time.


Goal Imagery vs Fantasy

Fantasy is a type of imagery in which one imagines scenarios that are not close to reality. The success of goal imagery comes from the fact that the images provide a clear direction for one to take action today in terms of present possibilities. For example, imagining that you are dating a celebrity is daydreaming because there is no feasible path today in terms of present possibilities, but that’s not to say there won’t be a path tomorrow. Goal imagery on the other hand goes something along like this: You want to have a successful youtube channel. The action is making youtube videos every week which slowly grows into that youtube channel in the same way series of drops lead to a full bucket. Thus you envision what a successful youtube channel would look with a few months of effort, then you envision the action you can take today. There is a clear connection between the action you visualize and how it leads to the goal.
Most people daydream (fantasize) all day on autopilot which is hindering success in the present. They dream about what they would do if they were rich or famous.They lose time that could be used doing something productive or having strategic visualizations. These fantasies also have a harmful effect besides time wastage. If you start imagining a world in which you have everything that you want, you start to become relaxed and demotivated. You start to develop what is known as “mastery” mentality which is what happens when one thinks that they have already arrived at a goal. A master has nothing else left to do so they live by inaction. Visualizations that gear more towards the “beginner” mentality are more motivating because the beginner has a lot of work to do.
My advice is to practice meditation a few minutes a day. This will train you to become aware of yourself. Thus, if you ever find yourself fantasizing throughout the day, you can shift your focus to something else. Also, start of spending about 10 minutes a day imagining the goals you have and the successful present possibilities that will eventually lead you to that goal.

It would be cool for you to learn Machine Learning.

I got into machine learning because I am also obsessed with how humans learn. I didn’t get very good grades when I was in middle school, so, since then, I’ve been reading books on learning psychology in order to learn techniques as well as honing those techniques while I’m working on problems or reading. But more practically machine learning is a way for software to adopt intuition that was only previously available to humans and that practicality is what drives me to learn more about it every day. Before, we would have to hard code all the details about a problem for a program to be able to employ a task. For example, if you wanted to program a computer to be able to detect someone’s mood based on facial expressions, you wouldn’t be able to. There are too many details about our face and so it would take too long to code up the algorithms to analyze all the intricacies that make up a facial expression.


Yet, why approach it that way when that is not how we learn? Aside from school, we learn by experiences, which we store as intuitive knowledge. If I were to ask you to describe to me in words what a curious facial expression looks like you would have a very difficult time talking about each and every ridge and crevice of the face. But, it’s very easy for you to show me how it looks like or show me a person who is curious. This way is much easier and relies on forming an intuition based on multiple examples. We don’t have to read countless textbooks on facial expressions and facial muscles in order to learn how people feel based on their facial expressions. We simply see the expression enough times to know what it means. This is the kind of learning power that software now has through machine learning. The future is about to be crazy.


There is already so much that machine learning can do for us but in the future this will become even more prevalent in our lives. Based on data about our behaviors, software becomes intuitive and is able to guess what we like and don’t like so it can give recommendations. As each one of us produces more data, the number of types of recommendations and the quality of recommendations is going to skyrocket. Imagine a world in which your refrigerator suggests a food based on your mood as determined by your facial expressions detected through a camera in you house, or even recommends food based on information on your current workout routine. Imagine your fridge being programmed to restrict certain foods based on learned health data and what it knows about your current health state. More controversially, imagine a world in which there is no financial crash because all the world’s financial institutions can predict them with ease.


How do you get into this exciting field? Well, Machine learning sort of works like a black box in which you put a piece of data into the black box like an image of a face, and the black box outputs a label for that piece of data such as “happy”. For this reason, in machine learning jargon that black box is called a classifier because it classifies a piece of unknown data sort of like a person sorting a bunch of unlabeled face into male or female. As you learn more you can determine the best type of “black box” to use based on the problem or go even deeper and develop your own new algorithm. So, as someone passionate about machine learning, you can either work on creating new machine learning algorithms or you can use algorithms that already exist in order to solve real world problems. Unlike in other fields though, the line between these two is blurred but still generally separated by a graduate degree. In my next post I describe the specific skills to learn it and how you can get involved today.

Questions are the Most Undervalued Note Taking Technique

I think that the advice I give here can also be used for other subjects but I want to focus on my experience with technical subjects because I study Computer Science. Here I’m going to explain to you why I find it efficient to go through multiple versions of notes and why my first version of notes is literally only questions.
To cite two eminent writers/researchers on learning and skill acquisition, Anders Ericsson argues that deliberate practice is what leads to expert performance and Cal Newport says that our most significant work is produced in a state of Deep Work.
To tie these two together, I believe deliberate practice is both what puts you into a state of deep work and is also what you are doing when you are in deep work. Sounds confusing, but let me explain what I mean by that. The only way to focus deeply is to be fully engaged with what you are doing but into order to be engaged you have to do something that gets you engaged. Once you are doing that you maintain the same level of engagement throughout that session. Methods of becoming engaged are referred to as orienting tasks and questions are my favorite type of orienting task.
This leads to my note taking method. I believe that note taking itself is Deep Work and thus should be approached in a deliberate practice manner. I see it as more of a way to organize and absorb information than as a way to keep track of what the professor or book said about a topic. The best way to activate this state while note taking is to write down any question that pops into your mind. As you go through, anytime you feel stuck or confused, that’s a question. Even if the question doesn’t immediately pop into your head it is still a question. If it’s not obvious what the question is, put in deliberate effort to figure out what it is.  Formulate what you don’t know into a question and move on.   If you remember anything from today, it should be that questions are the biggest source of focus while taking notes.
The Cornell style of taking notes is awesome but I prefer something more dynamic. Through a lot of trial and error I’ve learned that the more complicated the subject is the more questions are going help your first version of notes. Thus for the first version of a complex subject, don’t worry if you just write a ton of questions. My first version of notes is mostly questions which is a little hard to believe, but it helps me target what I don’t know and think deeply about it.
Now, comes your second version of notes. This time there will most likely be much fewer questions because you’ve already written most of them down. The goal of these notes is to use the space on the paper to tackle the questions in the previous set of notes. For this you have a toolset of learning techniques including breaking the equation into smaller parts, looking up other resources and even asking questions. In future posts I’m going to explain in greater detail some specific learning techniques for figuring out answers to the questions you’ve posed.
Writing down questions keeps you engaged throughout your initial session of absorbing the knowledge as well as helping you keep track of what you don’t know so that you can specifically tackle those concepts after your initial scan of the material. I also see questions as a sort of guide for what you don’t know so that you are never sitting still wondering what you don’t know or what you should study next. Just look at what questions you have and you’ll know what you need to figure out.